Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Research Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context CleanUrl: research Description A description of the content of the resource or work Entries in this section of the Copyright Cortex include both peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed research, exploring the law of copyright and its effects on policy and practice in a variety of cultural heritage contexts. From managing the risks associated with making orphan works available online to claiming copyright in digital surrogates of public domain works, this section catalogues data, evidence, and commentary across a wide range of topics. If you have any recommendations for material that should feature in this section of the Copyright Cortex please do let us know. You can contact us at: <a href="mailto:info@copyrightcortex.org">info@copyrightcortex.org</a> Journal Article URL https://static1.squarespace.com/static/53d069cde4b05f100c854faf/t/5852969337c5818614526ab6/1481807551799/Pandora's+Box+%282016+final+online+copy%29.pdf Pages (from-to) 1-12 Journal Title Pandora's Box ISSN 1835-8624 Institution University of Queensland Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource 3D printing Jurassic Park: Copyright law, cultural institutions, and makerspaces Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Matthew Rimmer Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2016-10-01 Abstract A summary of the resource. 3D printing is a field of technology, which enabled the manufacturing of physical objects from three-dimensional digital models. The discipline of copyright law has been challenged and disrupted by the emergence of 3D printing and additive manufacturing. 3D Printing poses questions about the subject matter protected under copyright law. Copyright law provides for exclusive economic and moral rights in respect of cultural works – such as literary works, artistic works, musical works, dramatic works, as well as other subject matter like radio and television broadcasts, sound recordings, and published editions. Copyright law demands a threshold requirement of originality. There have been sometimes issues about the interaction between copyright law and designs law in respect of works of artistic craftsmanship. In addition, 3D printing has raised larger questions about copyright infringement. There has been significant debate over the scope of copyright exceptions – such as the defence of fair dealing, and exceptions for cultural institutions. Moreover, there has been debate over the operation of digital copyright measures in respect of 3D printing. The takedown and notice system has affected services and sites, which enable the sharing of 3D printing designs. Technological protection measures – digital locks – have also raised challenges for 3D printing. The long duration of copyright protection in Australia and the United States has also raised issues in respect of 3D printing. There has been great public policy interest into how copyright law will address and accommodate the disruptive technologies of 3D Printing. As a public policy expert at Public Knowledge, and as a lawyer working for Shapeways, Michael Weinberg has written a number of public policy papers on intellectual property and 3D Printing. Associate Professor Dinusha Mendis and her colleagues have undertaken legal and empirical research on intellectual property and 3D printing. In 2015, Professor Mark Lemley from Stanford Law School wrote about intellectual property and 3D printing in the context of work on the economics of abundance. As a practising lawyer, John Hornick has examined the topic of intellectual property and 3D printing. Comparative legal scholar Dr Angela Daly has written on the socio-legal aspects of 3D printing in 2016. The World Intellectual Property Organization in 2015 highlighted 3D printing. 3D printing has provided new opportunities for cultural institutions to redefine their activities and purposes, and engage with a variety of new constituencies. 3D printing has also highlighted deficiencies in copyright law in respect of cultural institutions. Culturally and technologically specific exceptions for libraries, archives, and cultural institutions have proven to be ill-adapted for an age of 3D printing and makerspaces. The Australian Law Reform Commission has highlighted the need to modernise Australia’s copyright laws for the digital age. Likewise, the Productivity Commission has considered the question of copyright exceptions in its study of intellectual property arrangements in 2016. The Turnbull Government has contemplated somewhat more modest copyright reforms, with the draft legislation in the Copyright Amendment (Disability Access and Other Measures) Bill 2016 (Cth). Libraries, galleries, museums, and archives would all benefit from flexible copyright exceptions for cultural institutions to take full advantage of the possibilities of digitisation and 3D printing. Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Justice and the Law Society, University of Queensland Language A language of the resource ENG Rights Holder A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource. In Copyright Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource All Rights Reserved Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Victoria Stobo Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context CleanUrl: 3d-printing-jurassic-park-copyright-law-cultural-institutions-makerspaces Copyright Cortex Fields Extra CC fields for copyright information Jurisdiction Australia Size Details about the size of the resource (can be Bytes, Pages or Duration, depending on item type.) 2.1 MB Copyright Information Information about the copyright status of the record. In Copyright Keywords A selection of keywords that pertain to the article attached. 3D access originality exceptions and limitations Visual Date Date of creation or availability of the resource that is shown to users. To be formatted as follows: 2017 January 7 2016 October 3D printing artistic craftsmanship British Museum copyright duration copyright reform design law disrputive technologies fair use makerspaces moral rights Queensland Museum Smithsonian Institutes technological change technological protection measures Trove